Hosting performance charts (live) and historical data

Share this!
Share On Facebook
Share On Twitter
Share On Google Plus
Share On Linkedin

 
The purpose of this page is to show you the live charts displaying performance of all the hosts I monitor in one place. Also on this page I put together historical data on the hosting performance.

These hosts participate in Monthly Hosting Performance Contests. Each month I put together performance rating of the hosts according to the performance monitoring methodology. The results of the monthly Contests I put on this page.

Continuous monitoring like that is very important because otherwise it’s hard to find out how your hosting really performs. While you may notice some issues when visiting your website, you can’t do it every minute all days and night long. And this is what can be done by the automatic performance monitoring that I run using a professional web application monitoring service monitis.com.

By the way, the best hosting I’ve ever met during my researches and managing websites (I’ve been using more than one hundred hosts) are on my recommended hosting list.

I determine the best hosts by a number of factors among them performance (reliability, uptime, speed) is just a part of it. Very important factors are also customer support, ethics of hosting companies, their reputation among their current and former clients and professional hosting community.


Live charts displaying the current performance of hosting


There are two monitoring charts for each hosting: HTTP server response time (Time To First Byte) in milliseconds with uptime (determines a website accessibility) and full page load time (determines how long it takes to fully load a page for a real user) in seconds. The charts are real-time and updated every 1 minute and every 15 minutes respectively. The charts are interactive – you can change a date range and zoom.

The monitoring is performed from different US East and US West locations. Note that down-time or bad performance fixed from just one location does not mean that the website is down or slow to load – it just means that the ping did not come through (or other network issues) along the way from a monitoring location to the server and back. The site may be considered to be down or slow to load if both monitoring locations display issues at the same time.

Disclosure: There are some affiliate links on this page. In other words, I get paid if you click on the links and make a purchase. All such links open in new window/tab; no software/program will be installed to your computer. (This is a standard notice required by hosting companies.)

StableHost

Check out StableHost hosting plans
See my StableHost review

VeeroTech




Check out VeeroTech hosting plans
See my VeeroTech review

HawkHost



Check out HawkHost hosting plans
See my HawkHost review

SiteGround




Check out SiteGround hosting plans
See my SiteGround review

GeekStorage



Check out GeekStorage hosting plans
See my GeekStorage review

Squidix





Check out Squidix hosting plans
See my Squidix review

MDDHosting





Check out MDDHosting hosting plans
See my MDDHosting review

HostWinds





Check out HostWinds hosting plans
HostWinds has affordable plans. I’ve been monitoring this host since June 2016.

LunarPages





Check out LunarPages hosting plans
LunarPages has affordable plans. I’ve been monitoring this host since June 2016 (using the most basic hosting plan which goes without cPanel).

MochaHost



Check out MochaHost hosting plans
MochaHost has affordable plans. I’ve been monitoring this host since June 2016.

GlowHost



Check out GlowHost hosting plans
Although GlowHost is generally not bad, this is not included in my recommended list where I put together only the best of the best hosts. The reason why I don’t recommend GlowHost explicitly is that although it performs well, it’s still a bit worse from performance point of view than other hosts I recommend for the same price.

Eleven2



Check out Eleven2 hosting plans
I don’t find this host exceptionally good, especially compared to other host which I recommend in its price range.

GreenGeeks


Check out GreenGeeks plans
Its performance is not stellar compared to other hosts in this pricing category.

A2Hosting

Check out A2Hosting plans
See my A2Hosting review

InMotionHosting

Check out InMotionHosting plans
As long as I monitor this host, it shows pretty good performance.

 

Full page load time history table (monthly average)

(The less value, the better. Very fast host is below 2.5 seconds)

Hosting plans and prices: StableHost, HawkHost, SiteGround, GeekStorage, VeeroTech, MDDHosting, InMotionHosting, A2Hosting, LunarPages, Squidix, HostWinds, MochaHost, Eleven2, GlowHost.
My recommended hosting reviews: StableHost, HawkHost, SiteGround, GeekStorage, VeeroTech, MDDHosting, Squidix, A2Hosting.
 

Uptime history table (monthly average)

(The more value, the better. Max 100%. Very good host benchmark – 99.9%)

Hosting plans and prices: StableHost, HawkHost, SiteGround, GeekStorage, VeeroTech, MDDHosting, InMotionHosting, A2Hosting, LunarPages, Squidix, HostWinds, MochaHost, Eleven2, GlowHost.
My recommended hosting reviews: StableHost, HawkHost, SiteGround, GeekStorage, VeeroTech, MDDHosting, Squidix, A2Hosting.
 

Satisfactory Apdex history table (monthly average)

(The value means how much time speed was faster than 2.5 seconds. The more Apdex value, the better. Max 100%. Very good host benchmark – 99%)

Hosting plans and prices: StableHost, HawkHost, SiteGround, GeekStorage, VeeroTech, MDDHosting, InMotionHosting, A2Hosting, LunarPages, Squidix, HostWinds, MochaHost, Eleven2, GlowHost.
My recommended hosting reviews: StableHost, HawkHost, SiteGround, GeekStorage, VeeroTech, MDDHosting, Squidix, A2Hosting.
 
 
What you can do next?

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons